If we don’t respect rules, we are finished

by Sunny Bindra on November 2, 2008 · 5 comments

in Sunday Nation

After spending decades observing myself and my fellow human beings, I am forced to come to a somewhat cynical conclusion: most of us only behave well when we are compelled to do so. When left to his own devices and untrammeled by the demands of morality and legality, the average person will do all the wrong things.

I was forced to think about this recently when I found myself in Nairobi’s perennial traffic behind a KBS bus. The driver of this vehicle had clearly stopped being a bus driver, and had descended into matatu mania. The idea of a bus stop had been thrown out of the window; this man would stop anywhere and everywhere to pick up passengers, including on roundabouts and on the highway.

He was not alone in this; drivers of the rival Citi Hoppa firm were doing exactly the same thing all around us. I estimated that my journey took 33 per cent longer as a result of the drivers doing this. I stopped short of computing the average daily cost to the economy of society allowing this simple rule to be broken – my mental temperature was too high.

Are the drivers of our buses and matatus debased, dissolute reprobates? Quite possibly. Certainly, their willingness to drive on footpaths and force pedestrians to scatter, to force their way across lanes and into queues, and to cause brainless accidents taking dozens of lives suggests a certain depravity. But they are part of a bigger phenomenon, which might be termed moral entropy.

Simply put: if you don’t force people to do the right thing, over time they will descend into doing all the wrong things. You cannot depend on people’s good nature to improve society; you have to impose rules.

And so, if nobody forces drivers to behave on the roads, soon those roads will resemble jungles where anything goes. If no one compels people to dispose of litter properly, they will toss maize cobs, banana skins, plastic bottles and used condoms out of their cars and onto the street. If lanes are just lines on the road, people will soon drive in all directions at will.

If society did not condemn promiscuity, most men would sleep with every available woman and no family structures would be possible. If we did not have auditors, accountants would ransack all company bank accounts. If assault was not a crime, we would be attacking each other the minute we became angry.

If we did not enforce building standards, every contractor in the land would cut corners and buildings would be falling around our ears every day of the year. If the police force was not kept under strict control, its officers would impose a personal fine of 50 bob per day on every matatu. If teachers were not able to make their young charges behave, they would burn their schools down. If our leaders were not accountable for their actions, they would turn into hate mongers who would plan the massacre of innocents for their own political gain.

But ask yourself: are we so far away from all that? It seems no one is able to control behaviour on our roads, in government offices, in personal interactions, in public rallies, in the handling of taxpayers’ money. We are observing a general disdain for rules and regulations, a breakdown in personal ethics, a lack of respect for the rights of others.

Without those rules, we are truly finished. Without a system that regulates the behaviour of a society, that society will soon return to the bush from which it sprang. That is not a reflection on the African condition: it is a worldwide phenomenon. Those suit-clad rule enforcers from Western embassies come from societies whose ancestors were attacking each other with clubs not that long ago. India’s supposedly peaceful citizens massacred half a million of their number when the rules broke down during the partition of the country.

But those societies have since learned the importance of rules. Rules are a critical part of development; without them, every country would be a Somalia. It is no coincidence that Singapore, which has probably the world’s most advanced rules system governing all aspects of behaviour, has transformed itself from a bunch of fishing islands into one of the world’s most advanced and respected nations. And our failure to have a healthy respect for rules is taking us more in the direction of a Somalia than a Singapore.

Am I being too cynical? I don’t think so. We cannot rely on Kenyans’ love of God or humanity: we know that is deficient and defective. We can’t depend on the individual moral compass; that’s been pointing south for a generation. After all, we burn people alive in churches here; we burn down our own schools here; we steal from the poor here. We are not going anywhere until we enforce rules and respect them. How are we going to do it? We need SHOCK THERAPY. On that, more next week.

Related posts:

  1. Simple common-sense rules for wannabe investors
  2. Getting back our self-respect: the time is NOW

{ 5 comments… read them below or add one }

1 evah November 3, 2008 at 2:09 pm

that was spot on! but i have my doubts about the efficacy of shock therapy

[Reply]

2 Sunny Bindra November 4, 2008 at 8:44 am

Evah:

Allow me to write Part 2 of this piece before you judge shock therapy…

[Reply]

3 Sandy November 6, 2008 at 10:59 am

Anyone who aspires to participate in a legislative process should be forced to read “Lord of the Flies” by William Golding (and. incidentally, so should anyone who thinks that the TV series “Lost” is in any way innovative).

The darkness of human nature isnt easily redeemable, either through religious ritual, cultural obligation or legal imperative. In general, the story of human civilisation is that of a gradual descent away from peaceful co-habitation towards cathartic conflict. Eventually, however a new era of peace and relative observation of the rule of law follows, itself gradually disintegrating until history repeats itself in yet more catharsis. Kenya had one such catharsis last December.

The observation of the rule of law is indeed a measure of the extent to which a people can be described as civilised. That isn’t the same as saying that it is natural for people to be observant of law – our instinct is to act selfishly by doing what is most likely to benefit ourselves, perhaps within the confines of whatever codified legislation in which we find ourselves encumbered. Any loosening of these encumberances just means we act more selfishly. That’s what you see happening every day on the roads. It’s also what you don’t see happening every day in the world of commerce and finance, though the fact that you can’t see it happening just means it’s well hidden. Shock therapy wont result in a permanently observed moral compass (though I’m looking forward to your article), but maybe it works as temporarily effective cathartic action. Really, to stop us acting selfishly, you’d need to rewire us all genetically. Ask Richard Dawkins.

[Reply]

4 Sunny Bindra November 6, 2008 at 12:10 pm

Sandy:

Agreed on ‘Lord of the Flies’ – a masterpiece.

Shock therapy is indeed only a cathartic/dramatic way to start. But the state we’re in demands it…

Part 2 of this piece, however, is delayed by the drama of Obama…

[Reply]

5 Ayub Espila January 18, 2012 at 12:17 pm

It is disheartening to see those who spend hours shouting each other down to write and make these rules and those who are expected to enforce them, being the ones who break the same rules without shame. I think the Big Man Syndrome at work. Thus a monkey see, monkey do comes to play, if traffic cops overlap in traffic, an imbecile will do the same to feed his ego forgetting the cop is at fault

[Reply]

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: