A business filled with family members will not take you far

by Sunny Bindra on May 21, 2012 · 12 comments

in Business Daily

“The fatal fact about nepotism is that the really good people won’t go to work for you in the first place or will quit or quit trying for your job when they spot your uncle, brother, nephew, wife, mistress or son on the payroll…
…If there’s even a bare possibility that you’re prejudiced, the smell of it will scare off or turn off the very people you need most. The stockholders will never know how many good people they missed who never applied for a job”

ROBERT TOWNSEND “Up the Organization” (1970)

Bob Townsend was a one-off. A no-holds-barred plain talker, he ran Avis Rent-a-Car before writing his instant business bestseller, “Up the Organization.” I have referred to it before on this page, and intend to do so again.

Today’s excerpt shows Bob talking turkey about family firms. This was in 1970, remember, when many an American company had a significance presence of family members strolling around. He had the prescience to understand that businesses need to evolve out of this format as economies and markets mature.

The key reason for this is highlighted in the excerpt. If your business is bedecked with your cousins and uncles and nephews at all levels, what message does that send to your other employees? That this place has its “wenyewe.” That only the members of the family are on the true inside track, all others skid on the periphery. That if you don’t carry the family name, you are only going to go so high.

In Kenya the family business still prevails, and I’m often stunned by how few founders realize its limitations. There is no doubt that being a close-knit family endows great advantages in the early stages of a business. You get unity of purpose, bonding, and might even save on salary costs as you get your firm established. But once you are past that stage, you need to look beyond the bloodline.

At some point, you need to stop trying to shoehorn footloose family members into jobs they are patently not qualified to do. You need to get professional managers doing a proper job. And guess what? If those professionals think your company runs on nepotism, they simply won’t appear. They won’t even apply. And then, good luck with your expansion plans using your busload of happy families.

At some point, you will also have to expand the shareholder base. If you have any real ambition, that is; if you want to keep all control and call all the shots, then you can do that for as long as you like, but you will only ever have a medium-sized business.

It’s not just key employees; shareholders also dislike nepotistic tendencies. Why would they not? Would you really invest in a company where family members control every decision, and only tolerate minority shareholders because they need to raise extra capital?

Beyond a certain point, companies need funding and talent. Few families can provide those things in the abundance required. A time comes in the evolution of every family enterprise when wise decisions are needed about the future. These decisions involve relinquishing a degree of control in order to secure the future. The companies that make those decisions go on to become the Fords, BMWs, Oberoi Hotels, Tatas and HPs of the world. Those that don’t, become the also-rans who place a ceiling on their own growth by not being able to change their governance.

Many do, of course, ignore this advice. They do expand and spread, whilst retaining strong family control and presence. Those ones tend to come unstuck very publicly at a later date. Witness the tribulations of the Murdochs and the Ambanis. And closer to home, the problems now surrounding Tusky’s and Akamba Bus.

Related posts:

  1. How one famous family oversees its business
  2. The Edge: Growing the Family Business – out this Friday, 20 March
  3. A family business that’s 4 centuries old
  4. When the founder becomes the problem in the business
  5. Family businesses must let go

{ 8 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Justus May 21, 2012 at 3:54 pm

This is true. I think some of the family businesses don’t go far due to the ‘desire’ for the family to retain control. In that case the business ceases to be a business, and it turns out to be more of an ‘occupation’. As in, you just want a place to be reporting in the morning daily for the rest of your life. I know some shop in Biashara street that has been like that for the last 10 years (probably more). No growth, same stuff always.

[Reply]

Sunny Bindra Reply:

Justus:

Many like that, all over Kenya. Stagnant.

[Reply]

2 Mailuk Akeno May 21, 2012 at 7:01 pm

I like this post. It is without doubt that family managed business/company won’t overcome obstacles ahead. Most likely, the family members will to have shares in that business. It will be of low resistance for the main owner of the enterprise. When a small arise a division may occur leading to withdrawal of shares.

[Reply]

3 Audrey May 22, 2012 at 8:16 am

This is interesting. I had always thought the opposite of this. My brother and I are planning to start a business, good stuff to keep in mind

[Reply]

Sunny Bindra Reply:

Audrey:

It’s fine when you start out. But you must evolve as you grow.

[Reply]

4 Mary Good. May 22, 2012 at 8:52 am

Very true. It happened to me. With some relatives showing up at work at midday and others refusing to be sacked.

[Reply]

5 wamoronjia May 23, 2012 at 5:11 pm

Hi Mary
Relatives refusing the sack? Enough said.

[Reply]

6 K. Shah May 28, 2012 at 3:26 am

There is a lot to learn from the show ‘arrested development’, its all about how one big family gets greedy and they start ruining the business which eventually leads to a broken family.

[Reply]

7 Mungai Kihanya May 28, 2012 at 11:46 am

Sunny; did you have the goings on at Tusky’s when you wrote this?

Siblings are completely ignoring the lines of control and issuing conflicting instructions to “outsider” managers.

Others have been allowed to become suppliers of the company, perhaps in an effort to ensure that all proceeds remain within the family. But this has created serious conflicts of interest.

The whole situation is ugly and I fear that, worsen than bringing the business empire to the ground, it might irreparably split the family. That would be a very sad outcome indeed, for the family is the foundation stone of society.

[Reply]

Sunny Bindra Reply:

Mungai:

No, no particular family in mind. I have seen this pattern repeat itself across industries in Kenya: a business takes off powered by family unity; then grinds to a halt blocked by family disunity. Businesses must learn to evolve: what works in the early stages does not take you to maturity.

And, as you say, the collateral damage to society is family feuds and splits.

[Reply]

Jack Reply:

Well put. This article hits home for me. Having been in a Family Pastry business that flopped due to rivalry. Lesson learned.

[Reply]

8 Jed May 30, 2012 at 2:39 pm

Chamas, of which most of us are members of, have similar problems. All “contributors” want to be “directors” with equal say despite the level of capital contributed or level of skills, amongst other ills. Thank God I work for an organization that’s about to change this scenario.

[Reply]

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: